![]() |
|
|||||||
| Simulation Analysis simulation software (Arena, AutoMod, Enterprise Dynamics, ProModel, SIMUL8, WITNESS), input and output analysis, experimental design, optimization, simulation model verification and validation |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I´ve been hearing about chi-squared, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit tests for fitting theoretical distributions to empirical data. What are their similarities, differences, advantages, and disadvantages?
|
|
|||
|
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and the Anderson-Darling tests both examine the closeness of fit of the empirical distribution to the candidate closed-form distribution. The K-S test (as it is often abbreviated) calculates the maximum value of the absolute value of the difference between the two distribution functions. The Anderson-Darling test integrates the integral of the difference-squared between the two distribution functions, multiplied by a weighting function. This modification means that the A-D test (as it's often abbreviated) gives more importance to good fit in the tails -- where the simulation modeler's interest often focuses in practice.
__________________
E. Williams, PMC |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|